Homemade: Mysore Mallige

Infiniti awakenings. (IMHO)

All religions, in one way or another, believe in continuity, a multitude of the deepest part of ourselves, what we commonly call "soul."

We can almost say that it is precisely this that underlie all human beliefs, in fact we all feel this need to be anchored to a reality that is incomprehensible to us as we accept not to Ristaccia.

If the Christian religion sees the process as a journey that moves from earthly life to that of heaven (with a detour in the purifying fire if necessary), other religions and Eastern philosophies believe in a continuous return to earthly life through different bodies. This return
can be a voluntary choice or divine, and depending on the belief you can return or a complete human form in any of the ten thousand creatures (and even here there are differences between the various professions of faith).

For a change I do not agree with any of them.
Actually I think that, as with all beliefs, the principle has proved so right but then that has been misunderstood, more or less voluntarily according to the needs of every culture.

I believe that the endless revivals (in homage to the eponymous book), indicating the existence of all living beings, the continuity of the species.

• sorry the repetitions of "we" in the following sentences but are necessary to develop the speech, I hope they do not make tricky to understand.

I think the three things that make us (the physical body, rational and emotional) belong only to us (and we mean to us that we are living).
However, we do not belong to ourselves, but we are one of the infinite (this is to see if we continue on this road) awakening of our species.
in this key I think we can explain all the different beliefs of the world:

• Let's start with Christianity is that we can better understand the premise that the fear of hell was (and maybe even today is) an excellent deterrent and the hope of a paradise 'great incentive. In addition to this role but we can enter the link with the continuity of the 'soul' as our behavior to live affects all the other people present or future. To take a trivial but concrete example, if a man committed a murder the people who were really close to the victim will live a "hell" as well as those who are committed to helping others, a realization that they will try to reach a peace "paradise" that will transmit to those who help. This is because we do not belong to ourselves but we are only one of these infinite lives, to be added to old ones to give birth to the future. So heaven and hell are closer than we think but they exist, as there is life after death, only that we do not live, at least not with us who usually understood.
• Let's now talk of reincarnation they are based, for example, Hinduism and Buddhism, but he also speaks in the Bible. Some doctrines believe that life is a punishment that we must overcome in order to free the soul. Again, this vision is a great incentive to do their best to obtain the freedom of the soul. I am surprised that in all these different cultures so you should first of their personal salvation and you want so much to prolong our existence beyond existence itself. I see also the reincarnation explained from the point of view of continuity of life (not the soul), because we "reincarnation" in what we produce, we have made the foundation, more or less positive for the future life, create it physically and it is influenced by our Inevitable life. The other is us (he said Tozzi) and others we are and we (I say) without the need for mystical journeys, prisons and various purges.
• In some cases of reincarnation means rebirth in another living being more or less developed according to our previous life or in the more helpless we killed. This theory is based on an established principle as anything that gives her room to kill us (and I mean all of us here) that we continue to live, even if we eat more of that 'be because in this case life in the form of energy, which then passes to us live from it. But this is a natural and necessary because every life is and remains the only thanks to a very higher number of deaths, just think of the sperm or how many lives (I mean living things) need to feed off one at its existence.
• With regard to the metempsychosis, the belief already developed by Plato and his school, for whom life is not a punishment but an infinite number of trips that the soul chooses to live consciously, I think it's less incentive a variant of reincarnation but also more engaging for its scientific evidence (study of Jim B. Tucker, Virginia University, 2006), "Life Before Life" which describes, in some children the memory of past lives. I honestly believe that because we are the continuation of those already, we keep within us a memory of the case, not as developed as in other animals (intentionally, I would almost think), but that preserves the way done so far. This is not say that effort will remember things we have not lived, but also actually being inside of us, in the body, it is not improbable to think that this heritage may be manifested in the form memories (which are not very convinced).

There are also other kinds of beliefs in this area but are so far removed from our culture that I could not really understand the message.

I think he realized that my view of life does not refer to anything after, or rather, refers to everything after but not at a later when we are there even if we continue to exist indefinitely.
For this we must make sure that after this is as close as possible to heaven, let's do it if nothing else for us ...

... so I hope that this last part is to understand ... : D PS

. I want to clarify that what I write I do not mean in any way nor convince anyone still less to offend the other beliefs of which I speak, I will limit myself only to have my say, if there are people who think like me I'm happy but if there were contrary to interest me even more because I'm asking for with this blog (and in life in general) is mainly to confront, thanks.



Simlav.

Bernese Mountain Dog Pink Eyes

Way of Balance


A man with no balance is a bud in the cement
fierce storm on roofs and paper, however.
A man is only an atom of sky that can not change its course, but
can choose light or darkness issue.


He dreams of flying, he dreams of owning great wealth, dreams of being happy and lucky, dream, dream, dream without limits ... but that man is?


Everything on earth, but in fact the whole universe is governed by forces that maintain the balance, everything has its job, why the man wants to forget what's his?

It 's easy illusion of not knowing, it is easier to think you can decide what is the meaning for which to live, it's too easy to think that it is subjective.
Man has a big flaw, it is intelligent.
The human mind has the capacity so high that everything seems to be calculated by us and in fact man can give meaning to every phenomenon, from its interpretation on the basis of rules that you created. In view of these knowledges
feel they can dominate ... hurricanes, acid rain, melting glaciers, storm damage and war are the answers. Fortunately, the maximum

that man can do is destroy his own planet, no more, right now.
no more in the sense of, not worse, because of better and can do a lot.
Suffice it to be a little more stupid to understand that is wrong, to understand that it is not God because the God you believe in is none other than himself "in his image and likeness" ... the his god is just a way to legitimize its superiority, as his god loves him and created him as its favorite son, you feel you can make the earth what he wants.



Why do not we a little bit stupid to understand?

Many in these centuries have wondered: How can our God allow such terrible things?
Inside this sentence is to understand the whole truth.

-How can afford - indeed can not,
-things so terrible - who has permitted?
-Our God - ours?

The man needs to believe not delude ourselves.

There is no doubt that there is something superior to us but there is no doubt that this "thing" has chosen us as his children.
If we ruled the world is not God's will, the law is simply the world's oldest, one of the strongest.
And surely God (first principle, mother nature or call it a little as you like), does not think in a human way so it's no use trying to explain his idea and already the word is an interpretation of human thought, so wrong.

The only truly revealed and word is balance visible everywhere.
We follow this law, therefore, certain Eastern philosophies, and others, have understood since ancient times (though all with their human defects), have understood, have been isolated, but not because they seek to avoid the world but because they wanted riavvicinarcisi again.

I feel that it is useless to speak blasphemous words as I am doing and I believe that most if not all, of who is reading or even disagrees with this view is contrary ... and well ... I write just to compare, I say to my understanding, to find the balance ... LOL ...

Simone.